News
Holding North American Manufacturing Together
The Hidden Cost of “Just One More Adjustment”
Line Reliability & Best Practices – The Hidden Cost of Ongoing Equipment Adjustments for Packaging Line Reliability
February 12, 2026
On many packaging lines, the day doesn’t start with a major breakdown; it starts with a “small tweak.” These small adjustments feel harmless, even responsible. But the hidden cost you end up paying is the new normal created by these tweaks: reduced stability, capacity loss, accelerated wear, and a team that spends more time managing the equipment than running the line. This leads to reduced packaging line reliability.
What Counts As “Just One More Adjustment”?
An adjustment becomes ongoing when it is no longer part of a controlled, documented setup plan and is instead a recurring habit used to compensate for drift.
Common examples across packaging operations:
- Settings drift: temperatures, pressures, speeds, print parameters, vacuum/air settings
- Mechanical tweaks: guides, rails, belts, tensioners, squaring mechanisms, height/width changes
- Sensor and timing tweaks: photo-eye positions, delays, trigger points, encoder timing
- Quality-driven tweaks: chasing code grades, seal quality, label placement, case alignment, film tracking
These are not “bad” actions; the issue is frequency and repeatability. If the line needs constant tuning, there is an underlying issue that needs to be addressed. The long-term cost is lower when addressing a larger issue than suffering the effects of repeat tweaks that weaken the equipment and lead to unplanned rework and downtime.
The Hidden Costs You Don’t See on the Downtime Report
- Adjustments create pauses that lead to downtime that compounds
- Many lines don’t log a 30-second pause as downtime, but those pauses (and the speed reductions that follow) are a real capacity loss
- OEE frameworks call this out directly—idling/minor stops and reduced speed are major drivers of lost performance, even when the line technically “ran all shift”
OPERATOR TIP: If you adjust something 10-20 times per shift, and each one costs 30-90 seconds of interruption, verification, and/or restart, that’s up to hours of hidden time lost per week. It often shows up as “we just didn’t hit numbers,” not the real cause of “the machine was down”
- You trade stable throughput for temporary wins
- A tweak that fixes today’s symptom can create tomorrow’s variable
- Slightly lower speed reduces jams but changes print & label timing
- Tightening tension improves tracking but increases wear and heat
- Ongoing tweaks often mask maintenance-related losses (and those losses are expensive)
- When teams normalize chronic adjustments, they can unintentionally hide developing mechanical wear or maintenance needs until the problem becomes true downtime.
- NIST’s analysis of U.S. manufacturing maintenance impacts highlights how downtime due to maintenance issues carries broad costs (labor, energy, capital) and estimates billions in total losses before you consider the cost of quality losses and lost sales from delay or defect.
- Quality losses become “acceptable rework” (until they aren’t)
- Chronic adjustment cultures tend to accept more reprints/relabels, more scrap bins, and more QA holds “just in case.”
- OEE models treat quality losses as part of the same loss system as downtime and speed losses.
- When the line isn’t stable, quality becomes a moving target—and you spend more money proving you made a good product instead of actually making a good product.
- The highest cost: expertise gets trapped in people’s heads
- When the line depends on frequent “feel-based” tuning, only certain operators can run it well, setups aren’t transferable across shifts, training time increases, and variability grows with turnover.
- That’s a packaging line reliability risk purchasers should care about since the line’s performance becomes dependent on who is working, not how the process is built.
Greater Packaging Line Reliability: Controlled Adjustments vs. Habitual Adjustments
In stable operations, adjustments can happen for controlled reasons: changeovers, planned calibration, and documented product change requirements.
In unstable operations, adjustments can happen because drift is being “managed” instead of eliminated. Drift commonly appears as a result of: wear surfaces changing, loose standards for machine settings, poor changeover discipline, inconsistent incoming materials, environmental variation, and/or calibration gaps. The win is not “get better at adjusting,” the win is needing fewer adjustments.
Best Practices That Help Packaging Line Reliability
- Create a “Golden Setup” and treat is as a controlled recipe for success
- For each common SKU format, document:
- Target settings (and allowed ranges)
- Mechanical reference points
- This shifts the culture from “tweak until it works” to “restore the known good condition.”
- For each common SKU format, document:
- Build changeovers to eliminate adjustments, not perform them faster
- SMED principles specifically emphasize reducing or eliminating adjustment work by separating internal/external setup, standardization, and simplification of the changeover process.
- Practical packaging line examples:
- Replace “eyeballing” with measured scales/stops
- Use repeatable locating features instead of trial-and-error alignment
- Track adjustments as a reliability metric, not a personal habit
- If you don’t measure it, you will normalize it.
- Simple ways to track adjustments:
- Count “line touches” per shift (any setting change/shift)
- Log top 3 adjustment types
- Note the triggers for adjustments
- Even a basic log can reveal patterns that can help diagnose a larger issue or wear point
- Establish wear management and calibration cadence
- Packaging line reliability comes from staying ahead of drifting
- Replace worn items before they force you to tune
- Calibrate machine settings on a schedule
- Standardize cleaning methods
- This aligns with Total Productive Maintenance thinking: proactive operator involvement and preventative discipline reduces breakdowns, stops and effects.
- Packaging line reliability comes from staying ahead of drifting
- “Stop the bleeding” with guardrails, then improve
- You don’t have to redesign everything at once. Start with guardrails that lock parameter ranges for critical settings, standardize setup checks that confirm preference conditions, and add quick visual checks (like photos of correct setup, marks, scales).
- Then run improvement on the biggest adjustment drivers first.
PURCHASER TIP: When you are buying equipment or buying service/support, ask questions that expose adjustment risks.
Where Mid-America Packaging Fits
At MAP, we are big believers that the best production days are the ones that no one talks about because nothing needs to be babysat.
If your line is running, but needs constant adjustments, we can help you reduce repeat adjustments through setup discipline and standardization, identify where drift is coming from, and build practices that keep the line consistent over the long haul.
Contact your MAP representative today!
To speak with someone immediately, call: (314) 652-4583
For more information or questions, email us at: info@map-pack.com
Follow us on LinkedIn & Facebook for more tips, resources, and updates!